A new quantum mechanical formalism based on the probability representation of quantum states. The EPRB paradox resolution. Part I.Einstein’s 1927 gedanken experiment revisited.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Using new quantum mechanical formalism based on the probability representation of quantum states [14],[15] the EPRB-paradox is considered. We find that the EPRB-paradox can be resolved by nonprincipal and convenient relaxing of the Einstein’s locality principle. In Part I Einstein’s 1927 gedanken experiment by using the probability representation of quantum states explained successfully.
Downloads
Article Details
References
A. Einstein et al., Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
Bacciagaluppi, G. & Valentini, A. Quantum Theory at the Crossroads:
Reconsidering
the 1927 Solvay Conference 487 (Cambridge University Press,2009).
Born, M. Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance 109 (Oxford University Press,
.
Jones,S.J. & Wiseman,H. M. Nonlocality of a single photon: paths to an
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-steering experiment. Phys. Rev. A 84, 012110 (2011)
M.Fuwa,S.Takeda, M. Zwierz, H. M. Wiseman,A. Furusawa,Experimental proof of
nonlocal wavefunction collapse for a single particle using homodyne
measurements.
Nature Communications 6, Article number: 6665 doi:10.1038/ncomms7665
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150324/ncomms7665/full/ncomms7665.html
Schrödinger, E. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems.
Proc.Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 553 (1935).
Terhal, B. M. Bell inequalities and the separability criterion. Phys. Lett. A 271,
–326 (2000)
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).
Mittelstaedt, P. "The Problem of Decoherence and the EPR-Paradox."
Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems, Edited by P.
Blanchard, D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, I.-O. Stamatescu, Lecture Notes in
Physics,
Published by Springer Berlin Heidelberg ISBN: 978-3-540-66899-2
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46657-6
E.G.Cavalcanti, S.J.Jones, H. M. Wiseman, M. D. Reid, Experimental criteria for
steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,Phys. Rev. A 80, 032112
(2009)
http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1109v2
M. D. Reid,The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and Entanglement 1:
Signatures of
EPR correlations for continuous variables.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112038v1
E. G. Cavalcanti, P. D. Drummond, H. A. Bachor, M. D. Reid,Spin entanglement,
decoherence and Bohm’s EPR paradox,Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 21, pp.
-18702 (2009) http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3798
M. D. Reid, P. D. Drummond, E. G. Cavalcanti, W. P. Bowen, P. K. Lam, H. A.
Bachor, U. L. Andersen, G. Leuchs The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: from
concepts to applications,Rev.Mod. Phys. 81, 1727 (2009)
http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0270
Foukzon, J., Potapov, A., Men’kova, E. and Podosenov, S. (2017) Schrödinger’s
Cat Paradox Resolution Using GRW Collapse Model: Von Neumann
Measurement Postulate Revisited. Journal of Applied Mathematics and
Physics, 5, 494-521. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2017.52044.
Foukzon, J., Potapov, A., Men’kova, E. and Podosenov, S. Schrödinger’s Cat
Paradox Resolution: A New Quantum Mechanical Formalism Based on the
Probability Representation of Continuous Observables
Paperback 84 pages,Publisher: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
(December 19, 2017).ISBN-10: 3659935433;ISBN-13: 978-3659935435
S. L. Adler, Where is quantum theory headed? Journal of Physics: Conference
Series 504 (2014) 012002 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/504/1/012002
V. Manko, Classical propagators of quadratic quantum systems,
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, November 1999, Volume 121, Issue 2,pp. 1496-1505 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4213/tmf809
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02557220#page-1
.Mancini,V.I.Man’ko,P.Tombesi.Phys.Lett.A.1996.V.213.P.1
T. Guerreiro, B. Sanguinetti, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, A. Suarez, Single-photon space-like antibunching. arXiv:1204.1712v1 [quant-ph] 8 Apr 2012
D.H.Fremlin, Measure Theory,Volume 3: Measure Algebras, May 31, 2002.
M. Gondran, A. Gondran, Measurement in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation:
Double-slit, Stern-Gerlach and EPR-B. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4757
P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, M. Durska, D. M. Whittaker, I. J. Luxmoore, B. Royall, D.
N.
Krizhanovskii, M. S.Skolnick, I. Farrer, and D. A. Ritchie, Applied Physics Letters
,
(2013).
P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, D. V. Skryabin, A. Yulin, B. Royall, I. Farrer, D. A.
Ritchie,
M.S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Nat Commun 6, 8317 (2015).
A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar,
S.M. Girvin, and R. J.Schoelkopf, Nature 431, 162 (2004).
D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, A. Wallraff, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais,
L.
Frunzio, J. Majer, B. Johnson, M. H. Devoret, et al., Nature 445, 515 (2007).
Y. Yin, Y. Chen, D. Sank, P. J. J. O’Malley, T. C. White, R. Barends, J. Kelly, E.
Lucero, M. Mariantoni, A. Megrant, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107001 (2013).
R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J.
Mutus,
A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, et al., Nature 508, 500 (2014).
Y. Sherkunov, David M. Whittaker, and Vladimir Fal’ko, Position-momentumentangled
photon pairs in nonlinear waveguides and transmission lines,Phys.
Rev. A
, 043842 http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03514
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (New York, Prentice-Hall, 1951).
D.,Bohm,Y.,Aharonov, Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of
Einstein,
Rosen, and Podolsky,
M. Gondran, A. Gondran, "A complete analysis of the Stern-Gerlach experiment
using Pauli spinors", quantph/05 1276 (2005).
John C. Howell, Ryan S. Bennink, Sean J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd
Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Using Momentum and
Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion
http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~howell/mysite2/EPR%20PRL.pdf
Z.Y. Ou, S. F. Pereira, H. J. Kimble, and K. C. Peng, Realization of the
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68,
J.Clauser, M.Horne, A.Shimony, R.Holt, (1969). "Proposed Experiment to Test
Local
Hidden-Variable Theories". Physical Review Letters. 23 (15): 880–884.